All Sides of All Things

Once many years ago when I was more young, and by far more foolish, I remember reading an article in the newspaper about a train conductor (are they still really called that? Am I dating myself?) who was suing for emotional distress a protester whose legs had been severed by the train he was driving. I didn’t yet know what emotional distress or post traumatic stress disorder felt like. I didn’t know much. In reading the newspaper at all I was reading over my head.

So immediately I made a derisive comment aloud to my father about the gall of the conductor for suing the now legless man. My father checked my naive arrogance and checked me good. He explained to me that had I read the entire article I would know that the protester was well aware that the train could not possibly stop in time yet he decided anyway to make his point by laying himself across the tracks, knowing he’d lose his legs. He somehow did not or could not take into consideration the effect it would have on the conductor. He was not protesting the conductor. I forget what he was actually protesting.

But the conductor had to live the rest of his life with the horror of what he had seen and relive the terror of watching his train rapidly approaching the man lying across the tracks without the ability to stop it. So I switched the object of my reproach to the protester; snorting with derision from my other nostril perhaps, to which my father begged me to consider that if people did not protest things then how would they be heard and how would change be effected and pointed out all the good that has been accomplished by past protests. So I asked what good would suing the now legless protester do? I forget the exact reply but it had something to do with also being heard and sending a message about the how and why of protesting and the effects of such protests on all involved including the innocent. I remember feeling duly shamed, and I learned the importance of gathering all of the facts before rushing to judgment, seeing all sides of things at all times and also of not being afraid to speak up.

I don’t even know if my father knew all the details but he took no sides, no stance on the article, but rather he defended all sides and taught me to acknowledge that without all the facts, a rush to judgment is imprudent, unfounded and potentially embarrassing.

2 Responses to “All Sides of All Things”

  1. I believe he was protesting a delivery of nuclear missiles or something to a nuc-u-lar missile depot.

  2. His name is Brian Willson and he and others were protesting U.S. arms shipments to El Salvador (and presumably from there to rightwing paramilitaries like Reagan’s Contras terrorizing Nicaragua). They sat on the tracks by the Concord Navel Base in ’87 expecting the train to stop since the crew knew they were there. Photos show that Brian tried to escape when he finally realized the train was not going to stop, but he failed and was rundown. The driver or conducter or whatever is full of shit.

    I worked with Brian during the ’80s here in the Valley and we went down to Nicaragua at the same time in ’86 to help in the Sandinista Revolution. Brian, among many other progressives here in WMass and around the world, were vehemently oppossed to the far-right Reagan doctrine which worked to overthrow or destabilize popular democratic movements in Central America, instead favoring rightwing elites who would march to El Norte’s drum. [See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S._Brian_Willson ]
    After the train event, when Brian had recovered somewhat, I went to DC with him for hearings that Barbra Boxer and former Rep. Ron Dellums setup to investigate the incident. Nothing really came of that but I did get to sample some soup in the Congressional lunchroom among some of the biggest egos known to our species. Not great for the digestion.

    In any case, it’s interesting to note that Darth Cheney and the washed-up Donald Rumsfeld cut their neocon teeth in the Reagan regime at that time. There are more than a few other carry-overs in the present Bush regime; why do you suppose they’re so inclined to invade sovereign nations? It’s what they do! But guess what: they lost. Popular democrasies are on the rise in Central and South America. The Sandinistas are back in power in Nicaragua. Every time you gass up at Citgo your supporting Hugo Chavez’s Bolivarian Revolution, (BOYCOTT SHELL! BOYCOTT EXXON/MOBIL!). The neocons are starting to self-destruct and their grip on the Repugnican Party is unraveling. Toooooo bad.

    So much for today’s history lesson. There’s more but it’s not much fun.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: